<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s Just Another Layer &#187; vitoolkit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/tag/vitoolkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com</link>
	<description>Virtualization is a layer in software. What are you abstracting away from?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another mega slow VIToolkit call (Get-HardDisk)</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/03/another-mega-slow-vitoolkit-call-get-harddisk/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/03/another-mega-slow-vitoolkit-call-get-harddisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Get-HardDisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VI Toolkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitoolkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My good friend has found another VI Toolkit call that is amazingly slow compared to pulling useful data from it. I&#8217;ve done performance testing before of Get-VM against Get-View to get to the useful data needed day to day.   In &#8230; <a href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/03/another-mega-slow-vitoolkit-call-get-harddisk/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a title="Sentania.Net Website" href="http://www.sentania.net" target="_blank">good friend</a> has found another VI Toolkit call that is amazingly slow compared to pulling useful data from it.   I&#8217;ve done performance testing before of <a href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=47">Get-VM</a> against Get-View to get to the useful data needed day to day.   In that test using Get-View was 18x faster than using Get-VM.</p>
<p>This past week he was able to dig through the API/mob to find disk data for individual VMs for an internal tracking and reporting system we have.   This time he found a way to get the <a title="Get-VM is slow" href="http://www.sentania.net/2009/03/get-vm-is-retarded-slow/" target="_blank">majority of useful data from Get-Harddisk</a> a different way.   Rather significant change in speed with another couple hours of work.</p>
<p>This report he generates goes through about 1/2 of our VMs to pull VMDK information.</p>
<blockquote><p>Get-HardDisk =&gt; 35 hours</p>
<p>New method =&gt; 2 mins 15 seconds</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.  That&#8217;s right.   976 times faster.   Do the math yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/03/another-mega-slow-vitoolkit-call-get-harddisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

