<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s Just Another Layer &#187; solaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/tag/solaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com</link>
	<description>Virtualization is a layer in software. What are you abstracting away from?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Iron dead in the water?</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this true?  If so what&#8217;s Oracle&#8217;s game plan? They just buy Virtual Iron for a virtualization management. Appear to have a clue since they are buying Sun with a huge virtualization skill set and product line. Then this info &#8230; <a href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this true?  If so what&#8217;s Oracle&#8217;s game plan? They just buy Virtual Iron for a virtualization management.  Appear to have a clue since they are buying Sun with a huge virtualization skill set and product line.   Then this info comes along?</p>
<p>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/19/oracle_kills_virtual_iron/</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In a letter to Virtual Iron&#8217;s sales partners, Oracle says it &#8220;will suspend development of existing Virtual Iron products and will suspend delivery of orders to new customers.&#8221; And in a second letter to a partner speaking with <em>The Reg</em>, the company says it will not allow partners to sell new licenses to anyone &#8211; including existing customers &#8211; after the end of this month.</p>
<p>So is Oracle&#8217;s plan just to cannibalize Sun &amp; Virtual Iron&#8217;s code and forsake all the customers they bought?</p>
<p>Makes me pretty sad since I&#8217;m a big Sun fan with OpenSolaris and I have the fear that they will do the same thing there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

