<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s Just Another Layer &#187; businessobjects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/tag/businessobjects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com</link>
	<description>Virtualization is a layer in software. What are you abstracting away from?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Business Objects is Virtualization/MultiCore Stupid</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/09/business-objects-is-virtualizationmulticore-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/09/business-objects-is-virtualizationmulticore-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessobjects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have been involved in discussions internally on what it will take to get Business Objects onto a Virtual Machine.   The main talk has been around potentially removing another equivalent product and moving entirely over to Business Objects.   Then &#8230; <a href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/09/business-objects-is-virtualizationmulticore-stupid/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I have been involved in discussions internally on what it will take to get Business Objects onto a Virtual Machine.   The main talk has been around potentially removing another equivalent product and moving entirely over to Business Objects.   Then we got pricing for Business Objects.  </p>
<p>The standard piece of hardware today is pretty hefty even a small 1/2U system.   They come with multiple cores.   You have to do a special order to get anything less than a dual/quad core today.   An enterprise doesn&#8217;t order single sockets either.   Kinda silly to save $500 when you can have 2x the power and be able to reuse this system in the future for other purposes.  </p>
<p>They price and only price by physical cores in a system and on all systems their software could potentially run on.  </p>
<p>Business Objects is blowing a potential sale since today we only need something like 6-8 cores worth of power today and making these systems into VMs is ideal.   It isn&#8217;t like Enterprises are out to &#8220;screw&#8221; vendors.   Yes we all want a deal though Enterprises just want to pay for what they use.   If they would just license use of ~8 CPUs (virtual or physical or core) and let us make these VMs they win.  </p>
<p>Even for us to make these physical is a joke.    We have to disable cores and sockets to make us legal.  </p>
<p>So.. BO is blowing it.   They need to grow up and stop making Mainframe&#8217;s look cheap with their licensing policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/09/business-objects-is-virtualizationmulticore-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

