<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s Just Another Layer &#187; OpenSolaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/category/opensolaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com</link>
	<description>Virtualization is a layer in software. What are you abstracting away from?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Updating Opensolaris to latest development build</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2010/02/updating-opensolaris-to-latest-development-build/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2010/02/updating-opensolaris-to-latest-development-build/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be able to update from a post Opensolaris 2008.11 release to the latest development build use the following steps:

# pkg set-authority -O http://dev.opensolaris.org/dev development
# pkg refresh
# pkg image-update -v

I have finally found the correct website for the most up to date instructions:
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/index.shtml
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be able to update from a post Opensolaris 2008.11 release to the latest development build use the following steps:</p>
<pre language="bash">
# pkg set-authority -O http://dev.opensolaris.org/dev development
# pkg refresh
# pkg image-update -v
</pre>
<p>I have finally found the correct website for the most up to date instructions:</p>
<p><a href="http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/index.shtml" target="_self">http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/index.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2010/02/updating-opensolaris-to-latest-development-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Iron dead in the water?</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this true?  If so what&#8217;s Oracle&#8217;s game plan? They just buy Virtual Iron for a virtualization management.  Appear to have a clue since they are buying Sun with a huge virtualization skill set and product line.   Then this info comes along?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/19/oracle_kills_virtual_iron/
In a letter to Virtual Iron&#8217;s sales partners, Oracle says it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this true?  If so what&#8217;s Oracle&#8217;s game plan? They just buy Virtual Iron for a virtualization management.  Appear to have a clue since they are buying Sun with a huge virtualization skill set and product line.   Then this info comes along?</p>
<p>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/19/oracle_kills_virtual_iron/</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In a letter to Virtual Iron&#8217;s sales partners, Oracle says it &#8220;will suspend development of existing Virtual Iron products and will suspend delivery of orders to new customers.&#8221; And in a second letter to a partner speaking with <em>The Reg</em>, the company says it will not allow partners to sell new licenses to anyone &#8211; including existing customers &#8211; after the end of this month.</p>
<p>So is Oracle&#8217;s plan just to cannibalize Sun &amp; Virtual Iron&#8217;s code and forsake all the customers they bought?</p>
<p>Makes me pretty sad since I&#8217;m a big Sun fan with OpenSolaris and I have the fear that they will do the same thing there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/07/virtual-iron-dead-in-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLs and CIFS under OpenSolaris</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/acls-and-cifs-under-opensolaris/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/acls-and-cifs-under-opensolaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFSv4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the issues with running a file server in the home is the fact that you have multiple computers and accounts (the wife, the kids etc) accessing the same directory trees.   The default user/group works pretty well as you have effectively a single group for family access.  Different groups are used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the issues with running a file server in the home is the fact that you have multiple computers and accounts (the wife, the kids etc) accessing the same directory trees.   The default user/group works pretty well as you have effectively a single group for family access.  Different groups are used for more computer based access needs such as server to server communication.   However I found that the kernel CIFS doesn&#8217;t create files with proper access very well using the standard UNIX permissions. </p>
<p>ACLs are the solution in this case.   </p>
<p><code># zfs create -o casesensitivity=mixed -o sharesmb=name=storage -o quota=275G usbpool/storage<br />
# cd /usbpool/storage<br />
# chgrp home .<br />
# chmod A=group@:rwxpdDaARWcCos:fd:allow .</code></p>
<p>Now when you create a new folder or files under this CIFS folder it creates them with the group permissions.   I leave everyone in the same group and can add the secondary group as necessary for different shares needing permissions.   </p>
<p>When users create files they are created with:</p>
<p><code>----rwx---+  1 me   home       7930 Feb  7  2008 test.txt</code></p>
<p>And when they create directories they are:</p>
<p><code>d---rwx---+  2 me   home            3 Feb  9 22:10 OpenSolaris</code></p>
<p>Doable and functional.  I still wish there was better documentation that I could find around the ACL permissions and how they work.  I&#8217;m doing testing and I know I&#8217;m missing things.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/acls-and-cifs-under-opensolaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenSolaris 2008.11 &amp; NFS (security?)</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/opensolaris-200811-nfs-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/opensolaris-200811-nfs-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick note here after the past 4 hours of fighting with NFS on OpenSolaris 2008.11.   If you are attempting to do an mount and get a Permission Denied from either Linux or ESX the solution is rather easy.
Make sure that the IP address that you are connecting with has a reverse DNS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick note here after the past 4 hours of fighting with NFS on OpenSolaris 2008.11.   If you are attempting to do an mount and get a Permission Denied from either Linux or ESX the solution is rather easy.</p>
<p>Make sure that the IP address that you are connecting with has a reverse DNS entry with a hostname.   </p>
<p>That&#8217;s it.   4 hours and that&#8217;s the gotcha.   If you don&#8217;t have a reverse DNS you&#8217;ll never get the mount to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2009/02/opensolaris-200811-nfs-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
