<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP BL495c &#8211; Virtualization Blade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/</link>
	<description>Virtualization is a layer in software. What are you abstracting away from?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=21#comment-56</guid>
		<description>The BL495c is now supported by VMware and the 10Gb Virtual Connect module is available.  There was never a 10Gb pass thru.

http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=server&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=bl495c&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;stepping=&amp;nsockets=&amp;ncores=&amp;max_mem=

http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=io&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=NC532m&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=NC523m&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;vid=&amp;did=&amp;svid=&amp;ssid=

The BL495c is a much denser package than the Sun’s x6450.  It has 2 major advantages over the BL460c; twice the memory, and Flex-10 NICs.  The onboard Flex-10 NICs can be configured as up to 8 NICs with only 2 VC modules. 

http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/blades/components/ethernet/10-10gb-f/benefits.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BL495c is now supported by VMware and the 10Gb Virtual Connect module is available.  There was never a 10Gb pass thru.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=server&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=bl495c&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;stepping=&amp;nsockets=&amp;ncores=&amp;max_mem=" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=server&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=bl495c&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;stepping=&amp;nsockets=&amp;ncores=&amp;max_mem=</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=io&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=NC532m&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=NC523m&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;vid=&amp;did=&amp;svid=&amp;ssid=" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?action=search&amp;deviceCategory=io&amp;productId=1&amp;keyBasic=NC532m&amp;maxDisplayRows=50&amp;key=NC523m&amp;release%5B%5D=-1&amp;datePosted=-1&amp;vid=&amp;did=&amp;svid=&amp;ssid=</a></p>
<p>The BL495c is a much denser package than the Sun’s x6450.  It has 2 major advantages over the BL460c; twice the memory, and Flex-10 NICs.  The onboard Flex-10 NICs can be configured as up to 8 NICs with only 2 VC modules. </p>
<p><a href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/blades/components/ethernet/10-10gb-f/benefits.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN" rel="nofollow">http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/blades/components/ethernet/10-10gb-f/benefits.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=21#comment-8</guid>
		<description>VMware ESX drivers for the BL495c can be found in the following support page:

http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/DriverDownload.jsp?prodNameId=3621782&amp;lang=en&amp;cc=us&amp;taskId=135&amp;prodClassId=-1&amp;prodTypeId=3709945&amp;prodSeriesId=3621769

I am not an expert in virtualization, and hope that you can provide an opinion: what is the advantage of using the BL495c over say the BL460c in VMware environments?  

On one of our projects, we are looking to manage disparate development, testing and staging environments and applications where the hardware and software configurations change over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware ESX drivers for the BL495c can be found in the following support page:</p>
<p><a href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/DriverDownload.jsp?prodNameId=3621782&amp;lang=en&amp;cc=us&amp;taskId=135&amp;prodClassId=-1&amp;prodTypeId=3709945&amp;prodSeriesId=3621769" rel="nofollow">http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/DriverDownload.jsp?prodNameId=3621782&amp;lang=en&amp;cc=us&amp;taskId=135&amp;prodClassId=-1&amp;prodTypeId=3709945&amp;prodSeriesId=3621769</a></p>
<p>I am not an expert in virtualization, and hope that you can provide an opinion: what is the advantage of using the BL495c over say the BL460c in VMware environments?  </p>
<p>On one of our projects, we are looking to manage disparate development, testing and staging environments and applications where the hardware and software configurations change over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=21#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sold on the half-height blade concept either.  Keep in mind the chassis has a split mid-plane.  So what happens if the upper or lower half of the mid-plane fails (and yes it can happen).  If 8 blades go down that&#039;s 80+ VMs failing instantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sold on the half-height blade concept either.  Keep in mind the chassis has a split mid-plane.  So what happens if the upper or lower half of the mid-plane fails (and yes it can happen).  If 8 blades go down that&#8217;s 80+ VMs failing instantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceri Davies</title>
		<link>http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/2008/10/hp-bl495c-virtualization-blade/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceri Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsjustanotherlayer.com/?p=21#comment-5</guid>
		<description>How is that better than Sun&#039;s x6450 blade (http://www.sun.com/servers/blades/x6450/) which will take up to four six-core Xeons, has 24 DIMM slots allowing for 192GB of RAM and also manages to make it on to the supported list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that better than Sun&#8217;s x6450 blade (<a href="http://www.sun.com/servers/blades/x6450/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com/servers/blades/x6450/</a>) which will take up to four six-core Xeons, has 24 DIMM slots allowing for 192GB of RAM and also manages to make it on to the supported list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
